![]() The listing of community forum thread complaining about SF controller instability can be endless. Provided that the slowest SSD beats the trousers off the fastest magnetic HDD, I have got quickly arrived at the summary that dependability offers to end up being the 1 criterion for SSDs, and Im not really certain Sandforce can be there yet. Two with Sadforce controllers passed away within a few months or days (the RMA of one can be yet to be tested). Id nevertheless say for most boot and system runs SandForce is the method to go as it provides a substantial performance edge. Its fine to have got the 64 128 GB evaluations, but for energy builders the 256 GB is certainly becoming well known. ![]() With the cost of SSDs coming down, Toms should begin presenting 256 GB drives into its evaluations. If you considered that normal all this time, I possess some bad information for you. ![]() That is what we in the I.T business like to call: Faulty Hardware. Shoulda tossed in a Sixth is v4 128gm for enjoyment value.ah well.:P. This validates Crucials shift log, which indicates that shifting from 0009 would possess little effect on functionality. ![]() We will furthermore cover the additional finish of the range, and measure the efficiency during reads and from a unclean drive.įirmware Records: Since we up to date our m4 SSDs to the latest 0309 firmware, we observed a little benchmark switch.įunctionality in 4K arbitrary reads is inclined to become a little slower at low queue absolute depths.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |